Consequentialist Foundations for Expected Utility

نویسنده

  • PETER J. HAMMOND
چکیده

Behaviour norms are considered for decision trees which allow both objective probabilities and uncertain states of the world with unknown probabilities. Terminal nodes have consequences in a given domain. Behaviour is required to be consistent in subtrees. Consequentialist behaviour, by definition, reveals a consequence choice function independent of the structure of the decision tree. It implies that behaviour reveals a revealed preference ordering satisfying both the independence axiom and a novel form of surething principle. Continuous consequentialist behaviour must be expected utility maximizing. Other familiar assumptions then imply additive utilities, subjective probabilities, and Bayes’ rule.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Commentary An Argument for a Consequentialist Epidemiology

Epidemiology is the study of the causes and distributions of diseases in human populations so that we may identify ways to prevent and control disease. Although this definition broadly serves us well, I suggest that in recent decades, our discipline’s robust interest in identifying causes has come at the expense of a more rigorous engagement with the second part of our vision for ourselves—the ...

متن کامل

Consequentialism, Non-Archimedean Probabilities, and Lexicographic Expected Utility

Earlier work (Hammond, 1988a, b) on dynamically consistent “consequentialist” behaviour in decision trees was unable to treat zero probability events satisfactorily. Here the rational probability functions considered in Hammond (1994), as well as other non-Archimedean probabilities, are incorporated into decision trees. As before, the consequentialist axioms imply the existence of a preference ...

متن کامل

Dynamic decision making without expected utility: An operational approach

Non-expected utility theories, such as rank dependent utility (RDU) theory, have been proposed as alternative models to EU theory in decision making under risk. These models do not share the separability property of expected utility theory. This implies that, in a decision tree, if the reduction of compound lotteries assumption is made (so that preferences at each decision node reduce to RDU pr...

متن کامل

Other-Regarding Preferences and Concerns for Procedure

We provide decision-theoretic foundations for other-regarding preferences, i.e., preferences of decision makers who care about others’ outcomes in addition to their own. What appears paradigmatic about the choice behavior of such decision makers is a propensity to care about the ‘process’ or ‘procedure’ by which allocations are determined. Consider, for instance, Machina’s famous example of a m...

متن کامل

Subjective Expected

The expected utility (EU) hypothesis was originally formulated to be used with specified or “objective” probabilities. Objectively expected utility is the subject of Chapter 5. Not all uncertainty, however, can be described by a specified or objective probability distribution. The pioneering work of Frank Ramsey (1926) and Bruno de Finetti (1937, 1949) demonstrated how, under certain assumption...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1987